Concerning my future involvement as b2charm sub-convenor, I remind you of my statements from Sept 2011 :
On my part, I can only spare time to do the bare minimum of reviving the machinery and perform a standard update with no new features.
If anyone has the energy, time and interest to take over and do more than this minimum. I will gladly step down and help with transitioning of our DB content to some other form.
As it turned out the last update required far more than the bare minimum, due mainly to LHCb inclusion.
The machinery that collects results via web interface and prepares plots and tables has been barely surviving over the past few years. There are some aspects of the machinery that have worked well but overall it is a complicated collection of code that needs more time to maintain and operate than I have available.
Thus I would recommend that the new sub-convenor should cherry pick